AD Do you agree or disagree with the following statement？ Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication， such as letters， email， or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.

I would have to agree that face-to-face communication is the best type of communication. Face-to-face communication can eliminate misunderstandings immediately， cement relationships， and encourage continued interaction.

If you are talking to someone directly， you can see right away if they don’t understand you. A person’s body language will tell you they disagree or don’t follow your line of thought. You can repeat yourself or paraphrase your argument. If you had sent an e-mail， the person may have misinterpreted what you wanted to say. He or she could be insulted and you would have to waste time explaining yourself in another e-mail.

When you talk face-to-face， you communicate with more than words. You communicate with your eyes and your hands. You communicate with your whole body. People can sense that you really want to communicate with them. This energy bonds people together. Your relationship with a person can grow much stronger when you communicate in person.

Face-to-face encounters tend to go on longer than other forms of communication. An e-mail lasts a second; a telephone call， a few minutes. However， when you meet face-to-face， you’ve made an effort to meet with the person， and the person has made an effort to meet with you. You will probably spend longer together talking. The longer you talk， the more you say. The more you say， the stronger your relationship will be.

In summary， if you want to establish a relationship with another human being， the best way is talking face-to-face. When you communicate directly， you can avoid misunderstandings that may occur in writing. You can communicate on levels other than just words and you can spend more time doing it.

PR Some people like to do only what they already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risks. Which do you prefer？ Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.

I am not a risk taker. I like to do just those that I am proficient at. I have learned that it is better to focus my attention， do one thing and do it well， and not try anything new.

When I was younger， I was always experimenting with a lot of different things. First I wanted to be a dress designer so I studied drawing. I couldn’t’t draw so I decided to be a historian. That suited me perfectly since all I had to do was sit in a library and read. I learned to focus my attention on one subject.

I am a very good reader and history is very interesting to me. I decided not to read any other subject. I only read history books. I even focused my attention on Chinese history. I only read history books on Chinese history. I do one thing and I do it well.

I don’t like to try anything new. If I read things in another area， I don’t do well. I don’t understand American history or English history. The names are confusing and the stories not interesting to me. I don’t want to learn about anything else. Chinese history is my subject.

I may seem a bit stubborn， but I have learned what makes me happy. I don’t like to take a risk with new things. I like to focus my attention on one subject， do it well， and not try anything new.

好学英文网