Good Writing, Bad Writing?
Despite the modern desire to be easy and casual, Americans from time to time give thought to the language they use, to grammar, vocabulary,and official languages. And, as on other issues, they divide into two parties. The larger, which includes everybody from the plain people to the professional writer, takes for granted that there is a right way to use words and construct sentences and many wrong ways. The right way is believed to be clearer,simpler, more logical, and hence more likely to prevent error and confusion.

Good writing is easier to read; it offers a pleasant combination of sound and sense.

Against this majority view is the doctrine of an opposing minority, who make up for their small number by their great learning and their place of authority in the school system and the world of scholarship. They are the professional linguists,who deny that there is such a thing as correctness.

The language, they say, is what anybody and everybody speaks.Hence there must be no interference with what they regard as a product of nature. They denounce all attempts at guiding choice.From hxw.red.

Within the profession of linguists there are, of course,fighting factions, but, on this conception of language as a natural growth with which it is criminal to interfere, they are at one. In their arguments one finds appeals to feelings of social equality (all words and forms are equally good) and individualfreedom. These beliefs further suggest that the desire for correctness, the very idea of better or worse in speech, is what is left over from noble and times.

To the linguists, change is the only rule to be obeyed. They consider it to be equal with life and accuse their critics of being clock-reverses, enemies of freedom, menaces to"life".

好文章，坏文章?中文翻译；
尽管现代社会要求简单、随意，美国人却时不时地对他们用的语言、语法、词汇和官方语言表示关注。而且，像在其他问题上一样，他们·分为两派。多数派，包括从一般百姓到专业作家的所有人，都理所当然地认为有一种正确的遣词造句的方式，也存在很多错误的方式。人们相信正确的方式是使文章比较清楚、简单、更有逻辑性，进而更有可能避免错误和含混不清。好文章轻易读；它为读者提供了声音和意义的美妙结合。
与这种占大多数的观点相对的是持反对意见的少数派的主张，他们渊博的学识以及在教育界和学术界的权威地位弥补了人数少的劣势。他们是专业的语言学家，他们否认有正确的写作方式这回事。他们说任何人或者说每个人说的都是语言，所以我们不应该人为地修改他们认为是自然的产物。他们痛斥所有试图选择正确写作指导的做法。
在语言学家内部当然也有相互斗争的派别，但是在“语言是自然发展的，干涉即是犯罪”这一点上，他们的观点是一致的。在他们的论点中，人们可以发现社会公平(所有词语和形式都是一样的好)和个人自由的感情趋向。这些主张还进一步暗示：寻求正确语言表达的愿望，即话语有好坏之分这个观念本身是从有贵族贫民之分的那个时代遗留下来的，对语言学家来说，变化是惟一应该遵循的规则。他们把它看成和生命同等重要，并且谴责那些批评他们的人为想要“反转时钟”的人，是自由的敌人，是对“生活”的威胁。hxw.red

hxw.red